Are we back to mandatory retirement?


An interesting decision was handed down last week. The Supreme Court considered the case of Leslie Seldon, a solicitor who was arguing that he had been unfairly dismissed when his law firm forced him to retire at the age of 65. The compulsory retirement age was abolished in October last year, he argued, and dismissing him was therefore a form of age discrimination. His employers disagreed. They argued that as a business they had an obligation to provide for career progression and succession planning, and that that was a substantial reason to retire older employees. The Supreme Court agreed with the law firm and dismissed Seldon’s claim.

A setback for the law?

So does this mean that the law, drafted by parliament to end age discrimination, is not worth the paper it is written on? No. Not really. The court made it clear that this case concerned a small law firm with a particular promotion structure. In such cases there are strong arguments for maintaining compulsory retirement in order to promote younger staff or to plan for role succession.

In most cases then, it would not be fair to use retirement as an excuse for getting rid of a good employee without another cause. The advantage of the common law system in which judges interpret the law is that it is flexible enough to accommodate these concerns without undermining the act. If there had truly been a case of age discrimination, then Seldon would have won his case.

A balanced decision

In this decision, the courts have avoided the danger of a return to the old style of law in which litigants relied on fictions to achieve what they wanted. Businesses can now still say, honestly, that they are retiring someone due to their age, instead of having to come up with spurious allegations of poor performance or redundancy. They are, however, obliged to do so in a non-discriminatory manner. They must consider carefully, and be prepared to demonstrate, that compulsory retirement is the right business decision and is not simply based on age-related prejudice.

This law is still new and undoubtedly there will be more refinements to come. Employers are advised to keep in contact with their employment solicitors and HR advisors in order to ensure they stay abreast of new developments.

What our clients say about us
"The firm you recommended was extremely helpful. Your service has been very useful indeed and I won't hesitate to contact you again or recommend your service to friends and family." Liz, Family law, South Wales, Aug 13
"Thank you so much for your recommendation. The solicitor suggested really interesting alternatives, and gave me moral support. I'm so glad I came across your website."
LR, Kingston, Nov 10
"We engaged the solicitor's services and everything has been fantastic. It was such a relief...I wish I had called you earlier and saved myself hours of calls!"
Jaye, Civil litigation, N. Yorks, Feb 13
"Having accepted referrals for several years through Caven, I have been most impressed by the quality of their leads and their professional approach."
AE, Manchester Solicitors, July 09
"I was offered unbiased and honest opinions from the firm you put me in touch with. I felt unpressured and this took a weight off my mind." KS, Employment law, Oxford, July 12
"Caven's solicitors were fantastic and won me the compensation I was hoping for following my accident."

Tom F, PI, Edinburgh, March 09
"Sincere thanks for making things a lot easier for me and my family. When I contacted you initially I really didn't know where to start and was terrified by what costs might be involved."TC, London, March 11
"Your service was very quick, easy to use and I got legal advice in a language I could understand. Superb service!"

RC, Bristol, July 11
"Initially I was sceptical about asking a question online (never having done that before) but would do it again and would recommend others do the same." Pete Chambers, Feb 12
"Thanks for following up. We are going with and I'm very please with the way you have helped us. I will certainly recommend you to our clients." John, Commercial property law, The City, May 13
Brands we work with
Guardian Unlimited logo
Guardian Unlimited logoThis is logo